A Small Farmer's Dream & the City that Said No

If you follow the farm, then you know that for the past several years, I’ve been planning for my retirement. To transition out of farming, anyway. In doing so, I’ve had the absolute pleasure of working with a dedicated, experienced and professional team of generous, like-minded individuals. Together we brought life to a vision I’ve had practically since I first started farming this land.

It is a plan that would preserve and restore at least half of the beautiful green space, including the acreage under production for vegetables and small livestock, support several new small businesses, give countless visitors and local families a place to experience a slice of local history, and provide high-quality starter cottage style homes for 38-40 first-time home buyers or maybe someone looking for a truly unique, community oriented place to downsize and retire.

Pioneer Grove was never just a “project.” It was — and still is — a very personal mission for me to preserve the integrity of the land I’ve stewarded for over 20 years, find a way to share it with the community, and still to be able to retire with some dignity.

This proposed project received widespread support from local residents, with over 100 signatures on a citizen petition, unanimous support from Planning & Zoning last spring, City staff’s recommendation, alignment with the city’s 2036 comprehensive plan, and had interest from local artisans, potential residents, small businesses and neighboring developers, and farmers - all eager to be part of its future.

Big profits were never my driving force. Just ask my CPA — he told me I was leaving a lot on the table by not selling out and partnering with a big residential or commercial developer, who'd drop hundreds of houses or apartment homes, or worse, on this land without flinching. But he also understood what motivated me: to do something meaningful with the land and give back to a community that has become my adulthood hometown.

My highest priority has always been to balance the continued responsible land stewardship I've tried my best to provide with the opportunity to create something practical. Much of this land has remained in its natural state since long before this city was founded. There is a responsible way to develop land, and I'd found a team to help me do just that. 

It’s also not lost on me that I did not arrive where I am without help along the way. This project mix of community interest, residential and business, was my way of paying it forward: helping those starting out, as I begin to step back. A way to share with the community, what I was so lucky to find and be able to acquire many years ago - some of whom grew up running across this place as kids, fishing in the pond, climbing the trees and jumping out of the barn loft. I've heard the stories and it made me all the more determined to try to save the farm's place in this town's history. A history that stretches far beyond the brief tenures or the residencies of any of those leaders on our council.  

For the most recent City Council meeting on Monday, May 12, our development team had formally requested that our zoning application item be tabled. We had had to make this same request during the most prior meeting, after learning the item had been placed on the agenda without notifying us. 

We need time to reassess the project’s financial feasibility in its current form, given the current economic uncertainty across the nation facing many industries, including construction, and we also faced scheduling conflicts with key members of our team. Despite the formal request by the Pioneer Grove development team, outgoing Council-member Whitley placed the item on the agenda again, without formal notice to us, the applicants, (we once again found out through the grapevine that it was posted on the agenda), refused our 2nd request to table, and pushed forward a 1-sided discussion containing falsehoods, information irrelevant to this phase of the development process, personal attacks against me, until ultimately the majority voted down our application to re-zone. 

The representative for my district chose to abstain from the vote altogether. Councilman Salau has no conflict of interest, that I am aware of, and while he did express that the developer deserved the right to be present for the discussion — a fair and reasonable position - when the final vote came, he chose to remain neutral in a moment that called for leadership, even though his constituents had spoken in support of the project.

Dreams of many people, were derailed by the Balch Springs City Council — not due to the project's ethos or benefits for the city, merits by which a re-zoning is generally awarded, but because of immaterial misrepresentations made amongst themselves about the plan, political hostility towards me personally including lobbing some very serious accusations against me by sitting City Council member Hill - all without the developer or me there to set the record straight and fight for the project or counter the highly inflammatory personal accusations hurled. 

These are people the public elected, and recently, two of them - RE-elected, to serve their best interests in the city. They are not there to carry out political hatchet jobs, supersede the order of standing development polices and accuse citizens of illegal activity. They are not supposed to be there to use their power for their own personal vendettas against a former opponent, either.  

It was clear since the day the Council decided instead of voting, (suddenly, after being virtually silent in a prior briefing, (other than appearing to be in favor of the concepts presented), skipping public meetings and an offer of a guided site tour, failing to ask a single question while our entire development team was in attendance during the meeting scheduled for discussion and action), they needed a workshop because they had "so many questions" about the project. Again, questions never raised or passed on to the development team to address prior to the scheduled initial vote.

It was not until the night of the vote, that this group then suddenly determined they had too many questions to ask in the scheduled council meeting for that purpose, even with the entire team in attendance, including project engineer, architect, urban planners and property owner.

Delaying things for two months, the questions raised during the eventual workshop, were irrelevant and completely immaterial to the zoning application consideration and the established city development process itself. The tone from the dais was often hostile, condescending and disrespectful. I’ve been on that dais and asked questions of developers myself – but this was an interrogation intended to derail the project, cast doubt upon its validity and feasibility and not to understand its ethos and benefit to the community to grant a re-zoning. I've seen projects with much less benefit to the community receive more political will and gain passage. It has been very rare for our city to reject a re-zoning application unless there was a valid reason such as conflicts with neighboring land uses, documented traffic issues that would remain unaddressed or made worse by the proposed land use change, or the land use would not serve in the best interest of the community at large. Decisions are to be based on planning standards - not personal biases.  

At this last meeting night, Councilmember Tartisha Hill whom I narrowly lost to during her 3rd run for council, literally accused me of taking kickbacks (on my own project?) and alleged I had engaged in a conflict of interest while I served on council.

Let me be clear: while in office, before anything was presented to the city, I consulted the city attorney, who confirmed, that under Texas law, elected officials are permitted to develop property, even their own, so long as they recuse themselves from related discussions and votes. And there is certainly no law against a former council member from living their life and doing the same.

I was, of course, prepared to fully comply with those requirements - had I remained on Council. To suggest otherwise—publicly and without evidence— was not only baseless — it was a reckless abuse of power, rooted in willful ignorance and clearly intended to discredit both my reputation and the integrity of this project. As was available in public records, I had been out of office for nearly a year before the application was even filed, and the suggestion that I could somehow be taking a 'kickback' on my own project is not only absurd — it's malicious. It appears to be an orchestrated attempt to undermine years of honest work and intentions, and to distract from the facts in front of her, and smear my name.

Is this how we support fellow women trying to do something good for their community? Willfully attacking and besmirching their reputation? To think I once helped support this woman’s run for Congress.

That same night, Councilmember Elishama Myles, who’s district I previously helped defend against a proposed logistic center, (aka trucking and warehouse depot), that would most certainly have disrupted the quality of life of her constituents that lived on its border, as well as the school zone that would suddenly see a considerable influx of 18-wheelers, also shared mischaracterizations and hypothetical scenarios of the project, that distorted the facts of the proposed project's merits, and were irrelevant to this juncture of the project anyway. 

But just to be clear, this farm has hosted plenty of events, under the current CO, which has brought in visitors and tourists, some from all over the world, including a bi-monthly market day, for over 15 years, without disrupting traffic or impeding emergency vehicles, as was suggested would certainly happen, with a driveway half the size of the required new ingress/egress and parking lot that we outlined on our architectural drawings - preliminary but to scale. What I might find most ironic, is now this property could very well, by right as a commercially zoned parcel, become exactly what I spoke out against for her constituents’ sake.

What was said about me and the project during the meeting was not only misleading of the project's merit and an attempt to discredit my good name —it was completely false and unnecessarily vindictive.

Furthermore, all of this was just a distraction from what really mattered: the transformation of existing, mostly underused, land into a sustainable, thoughtful development that would have created jobs, preserved green space including valuable farmland, increased tax revenue - both sales and property, and provided new home-ownership opportunities for folks with quality built, true starter sized and priced cottage homes in a truly uniquely designed walkable community. 

The development team’s preliminary plans met or exceeded all current city requirements for roads, fire lanes, and emergency access for this phase of the process. We would not have received preliminary staff approval and recommendation or a unanimous recommendation from Planning & Zoning, otherwise. Many of the concerns raised — like a through-fare road and circulation — were platting matters, considerations to be addressed in a later phase, not a requirement for re-zoning approval. Even the city’s attorney said so. The mayor also tried to clarify the process for the council to keep them on track. And for the record, we have NOT met with city staff or Mr. Fenner regarding the project, since this council declined to vote on the application last fall, two more months after the inquisition disguised as a workshop was held in July of 2024.  

What happened at these meetings was not about zoning or feeder roads through a farm field, instead of following the current thoroughfare plan, or any one in a number of the other so-called issues. It was about personal agendas to enact petty grudges held by former opponents and leaders who differed from me on city issues, some stemming back over 2 years ago when I, too, served my community on Council.

The real loss is to the community — to the citizens who support this project and understand its value, and to all those who would have benefited from it: families, local entrepreneurs, and future generations for the wealth building opportunities - and not in the least, the environment itself. If I'm not able to enact this project, or one very similar, thousands of native trees, acres of native prairie and countless wildlife will be unearthed, killed and lost. The disrespect shown by this Council towards the professional developers of this project will not go unforgotten, either. 

To all of my CSA farm members, past and present, who support me in farming, market customers over the years, local and traveling chefs who have supported small farms, including this one, in their endeavors, to everyone who signed the petition in our favor, spoke at the several meetings held, sent emails and letter to this Council in support of the project, or stood with us in the many ways you all did — thank you. Your support means more than I can express.

I would also like to thank Dir. Chris Dyser and his development team at the city who were open to partnering with my team to design a truly unique and forward looking community project that would have included adding another acre of publicly accessible park land and walking trails - at no cost to the city.

Additionally, I’d like to thank outgoing, and as of this writing, now former, Mayor Gordon and sitting Councilman Gabriel and the planning and zoning board members for their vision to see a project worthy of political will.

Whether Pioneer Grove at Eden's can still be realized remains to be seen—but I will not allow my character, the expertise, passion and skill-set of my talented team, or intentions of the project, to be defined by those who seek only to abuse their power to satisfy their own vendettas and divide people.

You, the people of Balch Springs, and the greater DFW area, will be left with whatever ends up here instead, if the project can not be saved and I am forced to sell the property outright. You deserve better and better leaders making better decisions for you and your families.

It is a shame to lose such valuable working farmland, hundreds if not thousands of native, old growth trees and the wildlife that call them home and the opportunity for so many more families to share in this amazing place I’ve called Eden’s – and home - for over 20 years. I know that no amount of money can replace those things. And it is for these losses, that I am most sad. 

 While the future for me and this land is uncertain, and the timetable for any kind of transition remains indefinite, I am and will remain proud of the project my team and I created and the dream we all shared together.

There’s no defending the way the city’s leadership treated my team. We had hoped that the strength and substance of the project would rise above any personal bias or private, personal grievances still held by those in leadership. Was all of this legal? That’s a question I can’t answer. The handling of this application was certainly not done in good faith by certain members of the council, and their actions were mean spirited. 

After watching the meeting on replay, (as we’ve yet to be formally contacted by the city), as I understand it, we are now restricted from even reapplying to re-zone for this property for a year, unless there are "substantial" changes. At this point, I’m pretty sure my team is fairly disheartened and fed up with the city’s treatment of this process, and I’m in no position to ask anything more of them than they’ve already given.

I will move forward and away at some point. It is both for personal considerations and health-related factors that I will eventually retire from farming. But I remain committed to transparency, sustainability, and community. And, to pay the bills, I'll continue to utilize this land's rich soil and grow food for my CSA and the community. With the help of another farmer who has found himself without a place to farm, I can do so with two more hands to help carry the load. (So join Eden's CSA and chefs, get ready - we're ramping up again!)  We've already got a summer crop of veggies and fruits in the ground, with more planting in the works. A water well would be helpful for securing a long summer crop, but expensive, long-term investments at this juncture are on hold, for obvious reasons.

 Coming back - soon!

Due to new city restrictions, we are not allowed to host a farmer's market any longer, but - the good news is, we are permitted by State law to set up Market Day events to sell food produced here at the farm. So once we gain momentum, we will explore that option as well as the CSA and farm to fork eateries.

I’ll do my best to find a responsible buyer if I am not permitted re-zoning needed to build out the Pioneer Grove Agri-village and am forced to sell. But, considering most developer's obsession with the bottom line, often at the expense of environmental integrity and historic character, this felt like a rare and meaningful opportunity to do something genuinely special with this place. I'm open to suggestions. Feel free to reach out. 

 And again, thank you all for reading, and supporting local food.  

That's all for now.

Eat Your Food - Naturally!

Farmer Marie 

Follow the farm on FB, IG, or BlueSky and of course, as time allows, here on the farm blog.

Changes

Changes

You may be living under a rock, or purposely ignoring the world around you right now, if you don't already know that there are all sorts of changes going on. But I'm here to tell you, some of those changes, that some of you may have hoped for, are affecting things you may not have realized they'd affect. So if you'll excuse the soap box rant, I have a little something to get off my chest. I'll concede that budgets and procedures can usually benefit from tweaking from time to time. But tossing a grenade into a fully furnished area and starting over - is never the most efficient way of tweaking anything.

I'm not going to go into all of the international ramifications of these changes, because I'm not as familiar with that arena. 

But I am familiar with how these changes are affecting some things closer to home. One of those things, are farms. Like mine. Like so many others around the country.

There are various organizations that work with farms of all sizes, to help us do our jobs better. So we can grow more, nutritionally dense, safe food and do it in a way that is efficient, and better for the environment, which in turn, benefits the food and you, in the long run, because it ends up being more nutritionally dense. You see, it's a cycle. 

Some of those organizations use funds that are partially federally supplied.  I think we can all agree it makes sense for us to have a stable, safe and ample food supply here at home, right? 

Arriving at how best to do this thing called farming, comes in many different ways.  Sometimes they hold conferences that bring the private and public sector to central locations to share information, form co-ops where equipment and knowledge is shared. Some form partnerships with farms to protect top soil, livestock, water, etc.

Another one of those ways is through field research grants – where in real time, farmers give up the use of part of their land in order to allow these organizations to conduct various field tests to better serve all farmers who later tap into the knowledge base formed from the results.

I am one such farm. I have been cultivating and over-seeding a fairly large swath of growing area with cover seeds and tracking the results of weed suppression with the assistance of my NCAT representative, who secured grant funds through another organization. And I can't tell you how many times I've tapped into those vast bases of knowledge formed by previous farmers who partnered with research folks. This information is invaluable. 

Several years ago, I partnered with the NRCS to help preserve top soil at the farm by erecting a high tunnel that not only saves erosion, but allows me to grow more produce, better, for my community in the colder months.

Both of these projects were partially funded through federal grant monies. Fortunately, I have already completed the contract with the NRCS and was reimbursed the agreed upon amount.

Many farmers are in mid-process of various projects, however, and are now out money that they likely did not budget to spend, because they entered into a contract with their local NRCS office, (or name your favorite alphabet soup abbreviation organization), and now their reimbursed amount - isn't coming. Those monies are in jeopardy. And those folks consulting us, their jobs are going away or in jeopardy, too.

So now your farmers are on the hook for costly projects. Projects that they may have eventually undertaken, after they saved up or got low cost loans. And the folks consulting them, are going away, too. 

I took out a bridge loan to pay for the up front costs of the tunnel and had to pay 2 months of interest until the project was approved and sanctioned, and then reimbursed. 

I charged the costs of the cover crop seeds and paid them off when a check came. But the last, final installment, is being held up. So there are expenses I've had, that may just have to sit on the credit cards and cost this farm, and many, many others just like it, extra interest until either that final payment of reimbursement comes, or sales of products we sell cover it. Because our farm income money is already budgeted to pay for things like, mortgages, utilities, insurance. 

Most farms run on small, tight and fairly fixed budgets. And we don't all have outside jobs that keep extra money coming in when we fall short, due to weather or disease that take out a crop, (or a flock of chickens). Many small farmers don't carry crop or livestock insurance because they either don't qualify or it's not cost effective. So those hits hurt. YOU may be paying more for eggs at the store, but the farmer who culled his flock, isn't getting any of that money, because she or he's not selling any eggs for at least 8 months – probably longer. Because that's how long it takes to sterilize the farm, hatch and raise new hens to laying age. 

So, I'm appealing to you all right now. If you have a small farm, farmer's market or CSA farm program near you, reach out to those farmers and see if you can help. Shop those markets, first, before you go to the grocery store. Shop your small, local grocers who are the most likely to support local, small farms. And by all means, when you eat out, celebrate at our farm to fork restaurants who support small farms. Advertise in magazines like Edible DFW who showcase those businesses. 

I don't know what is in store for the foreseeable future. No one really does. But if we're all going to make it, we need to lean on and support one another however we can.

I'm in a weird spot because I'm trying to hand over the farming baton and retire, allowing a younger farmer to take over the plow and continue the farming here at Eden's. It's business as usual till then, though, and I physically can not increase my workload any more.

And if things don't improve, if the city doesn't agree to allow us to re-zone so we can expand the vision at Eden's to allow for that retirement, allow for a new, younger more able farmer, not only will the lack of valued and wise partners like NCAT, NRCS, etc., not be available for future farmers, neither will the land.

Yes, we have CSA memberships open. It costs $1500 a year, or $375 quarter, or $125 pre-paid by month to be a member of this farm, which gives you access to a share of the harvest each season. It gives you peace of mind to know where your food was grown, how it was raised and who has been handling it. It gives you access to the farm, (by appointment and within reason), to see how your food is grown and even offers you a chance to help out from time to time. 

It puts much of your money back to work in the local community where it cycles back around to our local funds.

Your memberships repair equipment, buy seeds, irrigation and growing supplies, and when available, help supplement the bigger projects we look to partner with various agencies to help make farming more efficient so we can feed more people for less. Like our high tunnel. Your membership makes it possible for farmers to farm and worry less about needing to supplement that income with another job. We're not all getting a spouse's income, too. Many of us farm alone. Not a complaint, just a fact. So yes, for those of us who didn't inherit our land, your membership pays the mortgage, too. 

I may never see that final thousand dollar payment that was due in January from that research project. But I'll manage. My CSA folks are good, generous folks who have helped out the farm during tough times in the past, too. 

However, I'd rather not need anything other than to get a few new members for our 2025 season to make up the difference.

So, if you live near the farm (we're in Balch Springs right off of I20/635), and you like fresh, local food, (we partner with other farms who raise grass fed/finished meats, and dairy, too), like the idea of supporting small farmers and can afford to risk the weather with us. We invite you to join us, or another local CSA, market, small grocer, nearer to you.

You can find links to our CSA application and more information on our website.  

Thank you.

 

Marie 

Eat Your Food - Naturally!

Where Do We Go From Here?

 The following is the reproduction of an email sent out to those requesting info on the Pioneer Grove Project. I'm updating the blog space....

What Took Place Monday

Our item was discussed in front of Council Monday night as scheduled. Staff laid out the the timetable of the city's process, where we were within that process, and what steps are still to be taken at later stages of the development process. Our team reminded them of past speakers, turned in another letter of support by someone who benefits from the farm, and asked for a vote of support on the re-zoning. We sought a yes vote, so we can move forward to secure funding, lay out more detailed planning, cost analysis, and begin to answer some of the housing cost and time-frame questions that have been coming in from some of you, who are considering living and working here at Eden's.

Councilman Gabriel, who has championed the Pioneer Grove project since he first heard about it as a Commissioner on Planning and Zoning, made the motion to approve the application for re-zoning, but there was not a 2nd to the motion, made by anyone else on the Council.

Because of that, the motion failed.

Is that the same as a "no"? Or is it just a sign that they're not ready to approve this? We're really not sure.

You can watch the 2 portions of the meeting related to Pioneer Grove's application here and here.

While it is at every city council's discretion as to how they desire to grant land uses in their communities, no actual reason was given as to why this land's use request, would not be approved.

·     The proposed use applied for was in line with the City's Comprehensive plan for mixed use, (the zoning we're requesting).

·     No alternative land use was suggested,

·     No one from the City has approached us with alternative wishes for uses of the land. After all, we are trying to provide a wide variety of uses; Residential, commercial, and public service via the farm, as well as park land and trails. I'm not sure what alternative land use would be more desired?

The land is zoned commercial, so that opens the doors to a huge variety of light industrial, retail, commercial (like-office buildings), and a whole list of other options.

But somehow plopping a warehouse distribution center smack dab in the middle of two residential neighborhoods, just doesn't seem like something anyone who lives nearby, would like.

I'm sure any of these other options could generate more revenue, and surely put more money into this farmer's retirement fund. But I've worked hard to be a good neighbor and a productive member of this community. That's not really how I'd like to leave it. I've previously fought against doing something like that to preserve another neighborhood in another council member's district a few years ago when I served on Council.

And protecting the whole of the acreage in a binding easement that restricts any development entirely, other than for ag use, doesn't seem to make sense when starter housing, start up business incubators and green-space/park land is in such demand.

But those are our options, if no is the final word.

As I stated previously, a couple of council members have raised questions that should not and cannot be fully addressed until after zoning is in place, (that's how things are laid out for all developers, by the City’s own approval process).

·     Securing an old title and permission to access or cross adjacent land for off street access, gets done during the platting process; which can not be done if zoning is not matched with the land use.

·     Detailed engineering, which is needed for emergency and safety sign-off, is done with the detailed engineering plans, but is not prudent to do, if the developer doesn't even know if they'll be allowed to do the project, (as required, a preliminary engineering report and plan has been submitted and approved by City staff).

These, and other steps, are handled after re-zoning, as per city procedures. Re-zoning is what gives us permission to use the land for the very specific land uses we have outlined in the planned development, which is called a PD.

We are confident, through various professional and preliminary inquiries and planning, along with our team's collective experience in land use planning, entitlements, and development, that each and all of these requirements will be met, in a timely fashion, during the appropriate, future phase of the process.

We, as the applicant, have done all that we've been required, by the City's own development process.

Where do we go from here?

That's a good question. Since the council did not vote at all, it is possible that it could be brought back, by Council, and later voted on. However, as far as us as the applicant, we have done all that has been required of us. It is out of our hands. Next steps to fully explore our other options have entered the discussion phases. Theses alternative plans, too, will take time to work through. I am not sure why the City would pass up this plan, but I don't want to drag things out any longer, in a wait and see, posture. As we are all painfully aware, it's been over 7 months since we filed our application for re-zoning.

Another option available on commercially zoned land is a drug/mental health/alcohol rehab facility. And I've considered that use. I'm sure the community could benefit from that, as well, it would work hand in hand with the farm and the green space preservation would be even larger without more homes built on it.

Why don't I just sell it to a developer?

I have had a variety of offers and options to just walk away with a big fat check and never look back, as bulldozers flatten everything and build a strip mall or some mini warehouse distribution facility. The property is already zoned commercial, as I have said, so many, many options are available to a developer "by-right". Meaning, they simply would have to get building permits. No community input, no council meetings. Just meet general commercial building requirements.

But, as I have stated to you before, my main objective in all of this, other than to have a secure retirement, is to protect this land's agricultural use and it's natural integrity as much as possible, while still taking care of myself.

Just today, I got a call from a young farmer who has been putting his blood, sweat and tears - not to mention rent money - into a leased farm plot outside of town for several years. He now, suddenly, has to vacate all of the work he's done to improve soil, move all of his equipment, and start over elsewhere. The family who owns it, has decided to sell the property, and have asked him to move off of it. I can't tell you how many times I've seen this happen to farmers. I know land is valuable. But we can't eat money. We must do more to set aside land for growing local food. And that's what I'm trying to do.

By creating a type of land trust here, one that would protect and set aside land for farm use, it would mean creating land for farm access into perpetuity. Not just for this farmer, but for generations of farmers that will come after him.

 What Can You Do?

Because of your association with this farm over the years, we believe you think this is a worthy cause, and a worthwhile project. Everyone in the public that we have heard from thus far, has thought so. We've passed on to the Council, each and every email, note and letter you have sent us. And some of you graciously gave up your time to come down in person and speak, too.

Thank you so, so much for that. All of it. It has meant so much to me. Reading and hearing your words of what this farm has meant to you, in support of the project, has reminded me that the impact of this farm, has been real, and far reaching.

But, perhaps due to the extended and repeated meetings, the long string of public comments made and letters sent, all of that has been somehow forgotten.

We know residents of Balch Springs, as well as folks from all over the region have chimed in since the early part of this year. But maybe it is time for everyone to chime in, with one last batch of their thoughts on the project.

Maybe if you all come in as one unified voice, over the next week or so, the message will be received by the City and they will actually see that Pioneer Grove and all it promises to be, is something their constituents, as well as tourists/visitors, future residents and business, really want and support. It's sure worth a try.

The email links to each Council member can be found on this page. And you can copy me here.

Maybe you have not yet spoken up. Or maybe you already have. Will you take another moment to tell the City you want them to take up this item on the agenda again, and to give it a vote - and to vote YES, to the re-zoning application for Pioneer Grove?

That would mean we can move forward to next steps, and we can then address the issues they have raised, take the steps to cure these issues, and produce a unique, important project that will make the City proud, and generate property tax and sales tax revenue for them.

I have been an independent farmer here for nearly 2 decades, and out on my own for many more than that. But I can't do this on my own. And while an easement will check some of the boxes, it just seems a shame to let this community down and walk away from such an awesome opportunity, to do so much more.

We need a simple majority of representatives to see the value, the desire from their community and beyond, in order to see this project through. So thank you in advance for your help.

 

Farmer Marie 

Eat Your Food - Naturally!

 

 

WHAT IS PIONEER GROVE?   I'm glad you asked! The 14 acre, mini development will consist of about 38 small, cottage-style homes, arranged within the concept of a pocket-neighborhood.  We’re describing this project as an “Agri-Village” because the existing, locally operated neighborhood farm, will remain at the heart of this new community. This new mixed-use neighborhood will also provide an environment conducive for small, independently owned business opportunities on the portion of the project just off of Pioneer Rd. The century old farmhouse and barn would be restored and converted for retail/commercial purposes. Our goal is to attract a farm-to-fork style eatery, perhaps also a coffee shop, farm store or other artisanal-minded businesses. We plan to continue the tradition of our small farmer’s market, community and school aged kid friendly events, like farm tours, films at the farm, classes for gardeners and homesteaders, and tourist events like the long-table dinners we’ve hosted here since 2010, that draw people to our community from all over the country. You can see more details about the plan at the website or on the Facebook page