If you follow the farm, then you know that for the past several years, I’ve been planning for my retirement. To transition out of farming, anyway. In doing so, I’ve had the absolute pleasure of working with a dedicated, experienced and professional team of generous, like-minded individuals. Together we brought life to a vision I’ve had practically since I first started farming this land.
It is a plan that would preserve and restore at least half of the beautiful green space, including the acreage under production for vegetables and small livestock, support several new small businesses, give countless visitors and local families a place to experience a slice of local history, and provide high-quality starter cottage style homes for 38-40 first-time home buyers or maybe someone looking for a truly unique, community oriented place to downsize and retire.
Pioneer Grove was never just a “project.” It was —
and still is — a very personal mission for me to preserve the integrity of the land
I’ve stewarded for over 20 years, find a way to share it with the community,
and still to be able to retire with some dignity.
This proposed project received widespread support from local residents, with over 100 signatures on a citizen petition, unanimous support from Planning & Zoning last spring, City staff’s recommendation, alignment with the city’s 2036 comprehensive plan, and had interest from local artisans, potential residents, small businesses and neighboring developers, and farmers - all eager to be part of its future.
Big profits were never my driving force. Just ask my CPA — he told me I was leaving a lot on the table by not selling out and partnering with a big residential or commercial developer, who'd drop hundreds of houses or apartment homes, or worse, on this land without flinching. But he also understood what motivated me: to do something meaningful with the land and give back to a community that has become my adulthood hometown.
My highest priority has always been to balance the continued responsible land stewardship I've tried my best to provide with the opportunity to create something practical. Much of this land has remained in its natural state since long before this city was founded. There is a responsible way to develop land, and I'd found a team to help me do just that.
It’s
also not lost on me that I did not arrive where I am without
help along the way. This project mix of community interest, residential
and business, was my way of paying it forward: helping those starting out, as I
begin to step back. A way to share with the community, what I was so lucky to find and be able to acquire many years ago - some of whom grew up running across this place as kids, fishing in the pond, climbing the trees and jumping out of the barn loft. I've heard the stories and it made me all the more determined to try to save the farm's place in this town's history. A history that stretches far beyond the brief tenures or the residencies of any of those leaders on our council.
For the most recent City Council meeting on Monday, May 12, our development team had formally requested that our zoning application item be tabled. We had had to make this same request during the most prior meeting, after learning the item had been placed on the agenda without notifying us.
We need time to reassess the project’s financial feasibility in its current form, given the current economic uncertainty across the nation facing many industries, including construction, and we also faced scheduling conflicts with key members of our team. Despite the formal request by the Pioneer Grove development team, outgoing Council-member Whitley placed the item on the agenda again, without formal notice to us, the applicants, (we once again found out through the grapevine that it was posted on the agenda), refused our 2nd request to table, and pushed forward a 1-sided discussion containing falsehoods, information irrelevant to this phase of the development process, personal attacks against me, until ultimately the majority voted down our application to re-zone.
The representative for my district chose to abstain from the vote altogether. Councilman Salau has no conflict of interest, that I am aware of, and while he did express that the developer deserved the right to be present for the discussion — a fair and reasonable position - when the final vote came, he chose to remain neutral in a moment that called for leadership, even though his constituents had spoken in support of the project.
Dreams of many people, were derailed by the Balch Springs City
Council — not due to the project's ethos or benefits for the city, merits by which a re-zoning is generally awarded, but because of immaterial misrepresentations made
amongst themselves about the plan, political hostility towards me personally including lobbing some very serious accusations against me by sitting City Council member Hill - all without the developer or me there to set the record straight and fight for the project or counter the highly inflammatory personal accusations hurled.
These
are people the public elected, and recently, two of them - RE-elected, to serve their best interests in the city. They are not there to carry out
political hatchet jobs, supersede the order of standing development polices and
accuse citizens of illegal activity. They are not supposed to be there to use their power for their own personal vendettas against a former opponent, either.
It was clear since the day the Council decided instead of voting, (suddenly,
after being virtually silent in a prior briefing, (other than appearing to be in favor of the concepts presented), skipping public meetings and an
offer of a guided site tour, failing to ask a single question while our entire development team was in
attendance during the meeting scheduled for discussion and action), they needed
a workshop because they had "so many questions" about the project. Again, questions never raised or passed on to the
development team to address prior to the scheduled initial vote.
It was not until the night of the vote, that this group then suddenly determined they had too many questions to ask in the scheduled council meeting for that purpose, even with the entire team in attendance, including project engineer, architect, urban planners and property owner.
Delaying things for two months, the questions raised during the eventual workshop, were irrelevant and completely immaterial to the zoning application consideration and the established city development process itself. The tone from the dais was often hostile, condescending and disrespectful. I’ve been on that dais and asked questions of developers myself – but this was an interrogation intended to derail the project, cast doubt upon its validity and feasibility and not to understand its ethos and benefit to the community to grant a re-zoning. I've seen projects with much less benefit to the community receive more political will and gain passage. It has been very rare for our city to reject a re-zoning application unless there was a valid reason such as conflicts with neighboring land uses, documented traffic issues that would remain unaddressed or made worse by the proposed land use change, or the land use would not serve in the best interest of the community at large. Decisions are to be based on planning standards - not personal biases.
At this last meeting night, Councilmember Tartisha Hill whom I narrowly lost to during her 3rd run for council, literally
accused me of taking kickbacks (on my own project?) and alleged I had engaged in a
conflict of interest while I served on council.
Let me be clear: while in office, before anything was
presented to the city, I consulted the city attorney, who confirmed, that under
Texas law, elected officials are permitted to develop property, even their own, so long as
they recuse themselves from related discussions and votes. And there is certainly no law against a former council member from living their life and doing the same.
I was, of
course, prepared to fully comply with those requirements - had I remained on
Council. To suggest otherwise—publicly and without evidence— was not only baseless — it was a reckless abuse of power, rooted in willful ignorance and clearly intended to discredit both my reputation and the integrity of this project. As was available in public records, I had been out of office for nearly a year before the application was even filed, and the suggestion that I could somehow be taking a 'kickback' on my own project is not only absurd — it's malicious. It appears to be an orchestrated attempt to undermine years of honest work and intentions, and to distract from the facts in front of her, and smear my name.
Is this how we support fellow women trying to do something good for their community? Willfully attacking and besmirching their reputation? To think I once helped support this woman’s run for Congress.
That same night, Councilmember Elishama Myles, who’s district I previously helped defend against a proposed logistic center, (aka trucking and warehouse depot), that would most certainly have disrupted the quality of life of her constituents that lived on its border, as well as the school zone that would suddenly see a considerable influx of 18-wheelers, also shared mischaracterizations and hypothetical scenarios of the project, that distorted the facts of the proposed project's merits, and were irrelevant to this juncture of the project anyway.
But
just to be clear, this farm has hosted plenty of events, under the current CO, which
has brought in visitors and tourists, some from all over the world, including a bi-monthly market day, for over 15 years, without
disrupting traffic or impeding emergency vehicles, as was suggested would certainly happen, with a driveway half the
size of the required new ingress/egress and parking lot that we outlined on our architectural drawings - preliminary but to scale. What I might find most ironic, is now this property could very well, by right as a commercially zoned parcel, become exactly what I
spoke out against for her constituents’ sake.
What was said about me and the project during the meeting was not only misleading of the project's merit and an attempt to discredit my good name —it was completely false and unnecessarily vindictive.
Furthermore, all of this was just a distraction from what really mattered: the transformation of existing, mostly underused, land into a sustainable, thoughtful development that would have created jobs, preserved green space including valuable farmland, increased tax revenue - both sales and property, and provided new home-ownership opportunities for folks with quality built, true starter sized and priced cottage homes in a truly uniquely designed walkable community.
The development team’s preliminary plans met or exceeded all current city requirements for roads, fire lanes, and emergency access for this phase of the process. We would not have received preliminary staff approval and recommendation or a unanimous recommendation from Planning & Zoning, otherwise. Many of the concerns raised — like a through-fare road and circulation — were platting matters, considerations to be addressed in a later phase, not a requirement for re-zoning approval. Even the city’s attorney said so. The mayor also tried to clarify the process for the council to keep them on track. And for the record, we have NOT met with city staff or Mr. Fenner regarding the project, since this council declined to vote on the application last fall, two more months after the inquisition disguised as a workshop was held in July of 2024.
What happened at these meetings was not about zoning or feeder roads through a farm field, instead of following the current thoroughfare plan, or any one in a number of the other so-called issues. It was about personal agendas to enact petty grudges held by former opponents and leaders who differed from me on city issues, some stemming back over 2 years ago when I, too, served my community on Council.
The real loss is to the community — to the citizens who support this project and understand its value, and to all those who would have benefited from it: families, local entrepreneurs, and future generations for the wealth building opportunities - and not in the least, the environment itself. If I'm not able to enact this project, or one very similar, thousands of native trees, acres of native prairie and countless wildlife will be unearthed, killed and lost. The disrespect shown by this Council towards the professional developers of this project will not go unforgotten, either.
To all of my CSA farm members, past and present, who support me in farming, market customers over the years, local and traveling chefs who have supported small farms, including this one, in their endeavors, to everyone who signed the petition in our favor, spoke at the several meetings held, sent emails and letter to this Council in support of the project, or stood with us in the many ways you all did — thank you. Your support means more than I can express.
I would also like to thank Dir. Chris Dyser and his development team at the city who were open to partnering with my team to design a truly unique and forward looking community project that would have included adding another acre of publicly accessible park land and walking trails - at no cost to the city.
Additionally, I’d like to thank outgoing, and as of this writing, now former, Mayor Gordon and sitting Councilman Gabriel and the planning and zoning board members for their vision to see a project worthy of political will.
Whether Pioneer Grove at Eden's can still be realized remains to be seen—but I will not allow my character, the expertise, passion and skill-set of my talented team, or intentions of the project, to be defined by those who seek only to abuse their power to satisfy their own vendettas and divide people.
You, the people of Balch Springs, and the greater DFW area, will be left with whatever ends up here instead, if the project can not be saved and I am forced to sell the property outright. You deserve better and better leaders making better decisions for you and your families.
It is a shame to lose such valuable working farmland, hundreds if not thousands of native, old growth trees and the wildlife that call them home and the opportunity for so many more families to share in this amazing place I’ve called Eden’s – and home - for over 20 years. I know that no amount of money can replace those things. And it is for these losses, that I am most sad.
While the future for me and this land is uncertain, and the timetable for any kind of transition remains indefinite, I am and will remain proud of the project my team and I created and the dream we all shared together.
There’s no defending the way the city’s leadership treated my team. We had hoped that the strength and substance of the project would rise above any personal bias or private, personal grievances still held by those in leadership. Was all of this legal? That’s a question I can’t answer. The handling of this application was certainly not done in good faith by certain members of the council, and their actions were mean spirited.
After watching the meeting on replay, (as we’ve yet to
be formally contacted by the city), as I understand it, we are now restricted
from even reapplying to re-zone for this property for a year, unless there are
"substantial" changes. At this point, I’m pretty sure my team is fairly disheartened and fed up with the city’s treatment of this
process, and I’m in no position to ask anything more of them than
they’ve already given.
I will move forward and away at some point. It is both for personal
considerations and health-related factors that I will eventually retire from farming.
But I remain committed to transparency, sustainability, and community.
And, to pay the bills, I'll continue to utilize this land's rich soil and grow food for my CSA and the community. With the help of another farmer who has found himself without a place to farm, I can do so with two more hands to help carry the load. (So join Eden's CSA and chefs, get ready - we're ramping up again!) We've already got a summer crop of veggies and fruits in the ground, with more planting in the works. A water well would be helpful for securing a long summer crop, but expensive, long-term investments at this juncture are on hold, for obvious reasons.
Due to new city restrictions, we are not allowed to host a farmer's market any longer, but - the good news is, we are permitted by State law to set up Market Day events to sell food produced here at the farm. So once we gain momentum, we will explore that option as well as the CSA and farm to fork eateries.
I’ll do my best to find a responsible buyer if I am not permitted re-zoning needed to build out the Pioneer Grove Agri-village and am forced to sell. But, considering most developer's obsession with the bottom line, often at the expense of environmental integrity and historic character, this felt like a rare and meaningful opportunity to do something genuinely special with this place. I'm open to suggestions. Feel free to reach out.
And again, thank you all for reading, and supporting local food.
That's all for now.
Eat Your Food - Naturally!
Farmer Marie
Follow the farm on FB, IG, or BlueSky and of course, as time allows, here on the farm blog.